Lucy Carter Quotes That Will Inspire You to Live Your Best Life

1. Because my life would amount to nothing! It’s just gonna be pleasure without purpose! Okay, so you said that one of the things that would be in my version of a utopian world would be the termination of the gender and racial gap in STEM. You are right. That would be a part of a utopia! However, entering the simulation would not change the gap in real life, so I would merely be living in a whimsical illusion, not a pragmatic and realistic view of how things actually are. Plus, going into the simulation would sort of imply that I surrender to the racial and gender stereotypes. By entering the simulation and not choosing to face my fears of being stereotyped based on race and gender, I am merely showing that I am too scared to live in the world as it truly is and too scared to make a change in the real world.You also said that fame for intellectual discoveries was part of my version of a utopia, and that is also true, but if I made all of my discoveries in the fantasy world, then my goal to be well-known in the world for intellectual discoveries would technically not be accomplished, because no one in real life would know my name. Some programmed beings would, but I would just be another human being in the real world. I wouldn’t be contributing to anything in real life!Dad nodded in interest. You’d rather be helpful than happy.Absolutely! The Reformation

2. I need you to think about the philosophical aspect! The Reformation

3. Also, many moral actions have a little immorality in them. For example, war could be done to rescue orphans in a village that is part of an empire, but this may come at the cost of killing people in the empire, so, from a bigger picture perspective, this action is morally right by current philosophical standards, because the warriors intend to benefit the orphans, but if one looks at the details behind the war, one should observe that the warriors intended to kill people in the empire that they possibly hate, so they intended to hurt the people, which could be seen as immoral. The Reformation

4. And another thing can be a sensory misinterpretation of reality. For example, I used to make a lot of art projects when I was younger, so I had a stash of colored pencils. I would often look for a black colored pencil to outline everything, but it would take longer for me to find a black colored pencil, because a lot of the pencils would look dark, so I would assume they were black until I picked them out and saw the label; a colored pencil that I could mistaken to be black can be dark purple or dark brown instead of black. During those incidents, I was misinterpreting the reality of those colored pencils. That’s why one might say, ‘I thought this pencil was black, but in REALITY, it was purple.’ I suppose the other five senses might also work. For example, the human ear cannot hear at very low frequencies nor very high frequencies, and if a person is isolated in a room with no sound except for a sound that is being played at a very low or very high frequency, then that person will think that there is no sound, but in REALITY, there is. This type of misinterpretation of reality can be known as a sensory anti-reality. The Reformation

5. For example, in the example with Terry and Chester, a person who was just beginning to meet the two could come up with the conclusion based on those two axioms, which a friend revealed to him/her. The person might try to come up with a solution to Terry’s hatred of Chester’s voice, and decide to teach the two characters American Sign Language, so Chester wouldn’t have to speak, but the person might later on discover that Terry seems to be functioning normally when Chester talks during casual, everyday conversations. It’s not that the person’s logic was incorrect; the conclusion was logically valid and logically followed the two axioms. It’s just that the axioms were accepted and assumed to be true. In reality, when the friend of Terry and Chester was referring to Chester’s voice, the friend was talking about Chester’s singing voice, not Chester’s actual voice, and the phrase Terry hates everything Chester likes could have been used hyperbolically, meaning that Terry does not literally hate everything Chester likes. The person came up with a logical conclusion, but the axioms were just immediately accepted as true; the person was not evaluating or verifying the information, nor was the person analyzing the multiple meanings behind the axioms. With critical thinking, however, there are a few stages that are required before making a conclusion: there is remember and understand, so to understand information, a person would need to see if the information makes sense or is plausible. For example, if a person was learning about the properties of matter, he/she should be able to understand that it makes sense for liquid to have faster moving molecules than solid matter, because it does not have a definite shape unless it is put into some container, or he/she might try to scroll through multiple sources of information to fill any gaps in understanding and confirm information. Unlike logic, which immediately accepts axioms as true to create a conclusion, a person must look at information with a critical eye in order to truly understand it in critical thinking. In addition, I think there is more skill and effectiveness behind deeply thinking about information (critical thinking) than trying to discover information (logic.) When it comes to thinking about the information (critical thinking), a person would have to understand the information’s real-world application (apply), the components of the information (analyze), the significance of the information (evaluate), and what can be made out with that information (synthesize.) Logic is an objective approach to trying to discover valid information, and it is highly important, but there is that lack of deep thinking when it comes to logic alone. A person would need critical thinking to verify the axioms and see the significance of the conclusion. Logic itself cannot view the significance of the conclusion Terry hates Chester’s voice, because it is meant to discover information based on axioms, not evaluate and make something out of information.With this, I do find that critical thinking is more important and has a higher range of skill than logic. The Reformation

6. However, if it is not viewed as an academic discipline, it might be different. In philosophy, things such as reality, knowledge, the significance of things, and morality are questioned, and since these things pretty much ask about life, every living being would probably have asked at least one philosophical question, because if a person is living, why would they not question their own lives? This could especially be the case with young children, who can ask questions such as How come adults can stay up late while I can’t? or How do you know that God exists? (And adults somehow think that us kids have less complex thoughts!) In these cases, a person questioning his/her life is trying to satisfy his/her OWN need to learn something, which is pretty much what Aurelius was trying to say. For the first question, How come adults can stay up late while I can’t?, the hypothetical child is questioning the purposes of children and adults, and how they contrast, which makes it a philosophical question, but the child pursued it not because he/she was assigned to do it, but because the question applied to his/her OWN life. The child might have noticed that the parents were able to stay up watching two hours of TV at 8:00 pm while being asked to go back to bed, and knew that the question should be asked during this point in his/her own life. The Reformation

7. I like saying ‘intellectual’ and ‘philosophical’ things. The Reformation

8. I mean, time may seem boundless and infinite, but the boundlessness and infinity only reinforces the limitations of time, because it shows our limited ability to reach the unlimitedness of time. Because of our mortality and the need for punctuality, we have no other choice but to be limited by time. I am limited by time. I don’t have infinite amounts of time to write this essay, let alone write every essay I want to write in the future, which ultimately can simplify to: I don’t have infinite amounts of time to live. The Reformation

9. I regret my philosophobia. The Reformation

10. It was oftentimes acknowledged that because the region they lived in lacked heat insulation (which caused it to be cold), and the colloquial term cold means to lack passion and emotion, the other three races theorized and overall concluded that the cryo-organisms lacked genuine emotion, passion, and love, regardless of the fact that equivocation is a logical fallacy. Logicalard Fallacoid

11. Morality is not absolute and is subjectively constructed, but if all human beings OBJECTIVELY observed, understood, and analyzed current philosophical standards for it, it is very relevant, because conducting actions for the benefit of other people is what is required for the ideals of United States politics. For instance, the eighth amendment states that excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted. Assuming that the phrase cruel and unusual punishments is defined as punishments that defy the benefit-intention duality, or punishments that may be considered to be excessively harmful and immoral, such as being sent to prison without a fair trial, then that would mean morality is relevant to preventing unconstitutional punishments from being inflicted. The Reformation

12. Needless to say, nobody questioned this theory, and, in truth, accepted it as an indubitably accurate fact. They didn’t question how the volcanic eruption was able to create a sufficient amount of breathable gases and potable water, even though the gaseous material that was released was replete with toxic, pestilential elements that could not have sustained the lives of the extraterrestrials. Logicalard Fallacoid

13. Philosophobia: Fear of Philosophy Ambiguity The Reformation

14. Since global warming was defined as the warming of the planet’s climate through the emission of heat-insulating greenhouse gases, and the therma-organisms existed during the beginning of global warming, the other three races theorized and overall concluded that the therma-organisms, with the hot temperature of their abode, were exclusively the cause of global warming. However, as one can see, the coexistence of the 2 variables (the therma-organisms’ residence in the planet and global warming) is not indicative of those variables actually being cohesively connected in a cause-and-effect relationship! Logicalard Fallacoid

15. Suppose you could die without feeling any physical pain. What would it feel like? The Reformation

16. The view on the equations was even more stupid--the extraterrestrials thought that because the equations used scientific notation, the imaginary unit, sigma notation, and alphabetical letters that were magically and ironically used in mathematics, they theorized and overall concluded that these equations were indisputably correct, since the hoo-mans (humans) on Earth used a multitude of calculus symbols and large numbers to learn more about the universe. Logicalard Fallacoid

17. Um," Michael said, Well… the reason I have become an INSURGENT, as you call it, is because you guys have always been telling us to recreate the past, which has been difficult because history hates me---I’m an African American. Also, although you tried to recreate good things in history---such as Dolly the sheep----it does not seem super beneficial, because you guys are moving BACKWARDS INTO the past, but you are not using past experiences to move FORWARD into the PRESENT in order to perfect the future. The Reformation